(… on my blog, that is.)
For a long time, my correlation heatmap with ggplot2 was the most viewed post on this blog. It still leads the overall top list, but by far the most searched and visited post nowadays is this one about dplyr (followed by it’s sibling about plyr).
I fully support this, since data wrangling and reorganization logically comes before plotting (especially in the ggplot2 philosophy).
But it’s also kind of a shame, because it’s not a very good dplyr post, and the one about the correlation heatmap is not a very good ggplot2 post. Thankfully, there is a new edition of the ggplot2 book by Hadley Wickham, and a new book by him and Garrett Grolemund about data analysis with modern R packages. I’m looking forward to reading them.
Personally, I still haven’t made the switch from plyr and reshape2 to dplyr and tidyr. But here is the updated tidyverse-using version of how to quickly calculate summary statistics from a data frame:
library(tidyr) library(dplyr) library(magrittr) data <- data.frame(sex = c(rep(1, 1000), rep(2, 1000)), treatment = rep(c(1, 2), 1000), response1 = rnorm(2000, 0, 1), response2 = rnorm(2000, 0, 1)) gather(data, response1, response2, value = "value", key = "variable") %>% group_by(sex, treatment, variable) %>% summarise(mean = mean(value), sd = sd(value))
Row by row we:
1-3: Load the packages.
5-8: Simulate some nonsense data.
10: Transform the simulated dataset to long form. This means that the two variables
response2 get collected to one column, which will be called ”value”. The column ”key” will indicate which variable each row belongs to. (gather is tidyr’s version of melt.)
11: Group the resulting dataframe by sex, treatment and variable. (This is like the second argument to d*ply.)
12: Calculate the summary statistics.
Source: local data frame [8 x 5] Groups: sex, treatment [?] sex treatment variable mean sd (dbl) (dbl) (chr) (dbl) (dbl) 1 1 1 response1 -0.02806896 1.0400225 2 1 1 response2 -0.01822188 1.0350210 3 1 2 response1 0.06307962 1.0222481 4 1 2 response2 -0.01388931 0.9407992 5 2 1 response1 -0.06748091 0.9843697 6 2 1 response2 0.01269587 1.0189592 7 2 2 response1 -0.01399262 0.9696955 8 2 2 response2 0.10413442 0.9417059
En reaktion på ”It seems dplyr is overtaking correlation heatmaps”
Pingback: Boring meta-post of the year | On unicorns and genes
Kommentarer är stängda.